Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z270
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z270 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z270 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-S200 versus Casio EX-Z270, both Ultracompact cameras and they are both built by Casio. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and EX-Z270 (10MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and EX-Z270 (1/2.5") enjoy different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S200 was brought out 20 months later than the EX-Z270 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-S200 scores vs the EX-Z270 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z270 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Casio Exilim EX-Z270. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Casio EX-Z270 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-Z270
| EX-S200 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 20 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Casio EX-S200
| EX-Z270 | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-Z270
| EX-S200 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z270 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z270 has dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S200 versus Casio EX-Z270 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the EX-Z270.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and EX-Z270 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z270 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The visual below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and EX-Z270.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-S200 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Casio EX-S200 will render greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern EX-S200 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z270 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z270 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.6-7.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lb) | 111g (0.24 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-80 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $0 |
