Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-Z35, both Ultracompact cameras and both of them are offered by Casio. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-S200 was manufactured 6 months later than the EX-Z35 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-S200 scores against the EX-Z35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-Z35
| EX-S200 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-S200
| EX-Z35 | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-Z35
| EX-S200 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | February 2010 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 has outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z35 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-Z35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-S200 against the EX-Z35.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and EX-Z35 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and EX-Z35.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to provide extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2010-02-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 124 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $99 |
