Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
![Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-S200/Casio-EX-S200-front.jpg)
![Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35/Casio-EX-Z35-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-Z35, both Ultracompact cameras and both of them are offered by Casio. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The EX-S200 was manufactured 6 months later than the EX-Z35 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-S200 scores against the EX-Z35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-Z35
EX-S200 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-S200
EX-Z35 | EX-S200 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-Z35
EX-S200 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | ![]() | February 2010 | Same age |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 has outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z35 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-Z35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-S200 against the EX-Z35.
![Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S200-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and EX-Z35 is 96 and 96 respectively.
![Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S200-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and EX-Z35.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to provide extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively.
![Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S200-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S200-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2010-02-21 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 124 grams (0.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | NP-82 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $0 | $99 |