Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR800
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-ZR800, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are manufactured by Casio. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the EX-ZR800 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-S200 was revealed 4 years earlier than the EX-ZR800 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the EX-ZR800 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Casio Exilim EX-ZR800. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-ZR800
EX-S200 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Casio EX-S200
EX-ZR800 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | August 2010 | Newer by 36 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-ZR800
EX-S200 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 has outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR800 has dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-ZR800 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-S200 versus the EX-ZR800.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and EX-ZR800 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by going through technical specs. The pic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and EX-ZR800.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to show extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-08-03 | 2013-08-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 222 gr (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $0 | $429 |