Casio EX-S200 vs Casio TRYX
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio TRYX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Revealed January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Casio TRYX Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Casio EX-S200 versus Casio TRYX, both Ultracompact cameras and both are offered by Casio. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the TRYX (12MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe EX-S200 was launched 5 months prior to the TRYX which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the TRYX in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S200 vs Casio TRYX Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Casio Exilim TRYX. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Casio TRYX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio TRYX
| EX-S200 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Casio EX-S200
| TRYX | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Casio TRYX
| EX-S200 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | January 2011 | Same age |
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio TRYX Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Casio TRYX has measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Casio TRYX in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 versus the TRYX.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and TRYX is 96 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio TRYX Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The visual underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and TRYX.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-S200 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio TRYX Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio TRYX Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim TRYX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim TRYX |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 21mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $689 |
