Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32


93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009

Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-S200 versus Fujifilm F200EXR, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") have totally different sensor sizing.

The EX-S200 was announced 16 months later than the Fujifilm F200EXR making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-S200 scores against the Fujifilm F200EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-S200 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | ![]() | April 2009 | More recent by 16 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-S200
Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-S200 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 has got exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F200EXR has specifications of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S200 versus Fujifilm F200EXR in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the Fujifilm F200EXR.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The visual below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-S200 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-S200 will give you extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The newer EX-S200 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2009-04-30 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $350 |