Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Launched January 2013
- Succeeded the Fujifilm F800EXR
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was announced 3 years before the Fujifilm F900EXR and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-S200 grades against the Fujifilm F900EXR in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
EX-S200 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Casio EX-S200
Fujifilm F900EXR | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | August 2010 | More recent by 30 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm F900EXR
EX-S200 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 comes with outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Fujifilm F900EXR has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 against the Fujifilm F900EXR.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and Fujifilm F900EXR is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The visual here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and Fujifilm F900EXR.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-S200 with its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Fujifilm F900EXR will resolve greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXR II |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 232 gr (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $380 |