Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Released April 2012
  • Previous Model is Sigma SD1
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sigma. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is very well matched but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-Z2000 was announced 3 years prior to the SD1 Merrill which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the SD1 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 EX-Z2000 SD1 Merrill 
Display resolution461k460kCrisper display (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Casio EX-Z2000

 SD1 Merrill EX-Z2000 
ReleasedApril 2012January 2010Newer by 27 months

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 EX-Z2000 SD1 Merrill 
Focus manually More exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the SD1 Merrill.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and SD1 Merrill is 95 and 57 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The picture here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and SD1 Merrill.

As you have seen, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will resolve extra detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
34
you can focus manually
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
65
focusing manually
good resolution (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no liveview
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography factors
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography factors
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than average (152g)
57
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography information
Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography information
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
61
good resolution (15MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
weather proofing
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography details
Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography details
62
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than average (152g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
54
weather proofing
good resolution (15MP)
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma SD1 Merrill Landscape photography highlights
46
you can focus manually
pretty wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse function
63
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
good resolution (15MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging information
Sigma SD1 Merrill Vlogging information
28
pretty wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic socket
heavier than average (152 grams)
9
no video
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Sigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Company Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Sigma SD1 Merrill
Class Ultracompact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2010-01-06 2012-04-10
Body design Ultracompact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual True II
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 15MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 4800 x 3200
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Number of lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 461k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs -
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 gr (0.34 lb) 790 gr (1.74 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-110 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $0 $2,339