Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Released April 2012
- Previous Model is Sigma SD1
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sigma. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is very well matched but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z2000 was announced 3 years prior to the SD1 Merrill which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the SD1 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-Z2000 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Casio EX-Z2000
SD1 Merrill | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 27 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-Z2000 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the SD1 Merrill.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and SD1 Merrill is 95 and 57 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The picture here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and SD1 Merrill.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will resolve extra detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 790 gr (1.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $0 | $2,339 |