Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Launched April 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm Z900EXR, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) is relatively close but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") have totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-S200 was introduced 8 months before the Fujifilm Z900EXR and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-S200 scores against the Fujifilm Z900EXR in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm Z900EXR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Casio EX-S200
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2011 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 8 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm Z900EXR
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 offers physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Fujifilm Z900EXR has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm Z900EXR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the Fujifilm Z900EXR.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and Fujifilm Z900EXR is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The graphic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and Fujifilm Z900EXR.
To sum up, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-S200 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will provide you with greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2011-04-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.9-4.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 151 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $380 |