Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak C135

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
Portability
92
Imaging
38
Features
17
Overall
29

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak C135 Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak C135, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the C135 (14MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-S200 was released 17 months prior to the C135 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Kodak C135 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-S200 grades vs the C135 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Kodak C135

 EX-S200 C135 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display dimension2.7"2.4"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution230k112kClearer display (+118k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Casio EX-S200

 C135 EX-S200 
LaunchedJanuary 2012August 2010Newer by 17 months

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak C135

 EX-S200 C135 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Kodak C135 has dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak C135 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 versus the C135.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak C135 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and C135 is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak C135 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching technical specs. The pic below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and C135.

As you can tell, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you would want to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak C135 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak C135 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography advice
Kodak C135 Portrait photography advice
35
has manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
34
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-S200
Street photography with Kodak C135
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
53
environment sealing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
low max ISO (1,250)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography factors
Kodak C135 Sports photography factors
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
31
decent MP (14MP)
environment sealing
can't change focal length (35mm)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography factors
Kodak C135 Travel photography factors
65
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (27mm)
no Time Lapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
64
environment sealing
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak C135 as a Landscape photography camera
42
has manual focus
relatively wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
32
decent MP (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.4")
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,250)
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging details
Kodak C135 Vlogging details
29
relatively wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic jack
25
has face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak C135 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Kodak C135
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Kodak EasyShare C135
General Information
Company Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Kodak EasyShare C135
Category Ultracompact Waterproof
Introduced 2010-08-03 2012-01-10
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1250
Min native ISO 50 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 35mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.0
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 2.4 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 112 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 2.40 m (@ ISO 360)
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 grams (0.29 pounds) 175 grams (0.39 pounds)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $0 $0