Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M590

On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M590, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the M590 (14MP) is very comparable but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and M590 (1/3") offer different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-S200 was announced within a month of the M590 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-S200 scores vs the M590 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Kodak M590. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Kodak M590 Gallery.

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 features exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Kodak M590 has specifications of 97mm x 58mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M590 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the M590.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and M590 is 96 and 99 respectively.

More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The pic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and M590.

As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The EX-S200 has the larger sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field simpler.