Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-860
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus TG-860, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S200 was revealed 5 years earlier than the TG-860 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-S200 scores against the TG-860 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Olympus TG-860
| EX-S200 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Casio EX-S200
| TG-860 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 54 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus TG-860
| EX-S200 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 features physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus TG-860 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-S200 against the TG-860.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and TG-860 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The pic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and TG-860.
All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to give you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 224 gr (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $0 | $279 |