Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S200 was brought out 9 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-S200 scores against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| EX-S200 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-S200
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| EX-S200 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 has got external measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 96 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-S200 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Casio EX-S200 will give more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer EX-S200 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2009-11-10 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 453 gr (1.00 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $566 |
