Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Its time to look closer at the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-S200 was unveiled 4 years before the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the WG-4 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-S200 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-S200
WG-4 GPS | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 42 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-S200 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 features exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the WG-4 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df9b/5df9b48779c6f6c476bf8ffbcc53081fa98e9bc9" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WG-4 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3620b/3620bbcf82bdb2030169eeaedd85e7e8ee5f15a9" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The picture below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to render extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87d17/87d179abd733f1a5204def227779ad4c8db803fe" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/231da/231da59b0fb06bff370288e355397614ef408c26" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 235g (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $0 | $210 |