Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-6
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-6, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-S200 was brought out 8 years prior to the WG-6 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-S200 scores against the WG-6 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-6. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh WG-6
| EX-S200 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Casio EX-S200
| WG-6 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 91 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-6
| EX-S200 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 offers outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has proportions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-6 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the WG-6.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WG-6 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The image here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and WG-6.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-6 to offer you extra detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lb) | 246g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $271 |