Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1L
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Revealed February 2006
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1L, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-S200 was launched 4 years later than the GX-1L and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-S200 matches up versus the GX-1L with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung GX-1L. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung GX-1L
| EX-S200 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 | February 2006 | More recent by 55 months | |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 210k | Sharper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Casio EX-S200
| GX-1L | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung GX-1L
| EX-S200 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 has exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1L has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1L in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 versus the GX-1L.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and GX-1L is 96 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by checking technical specs. The visual below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and GX-1L.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-S200 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Casio EX-S200 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-S200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung GX-1L |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2006-02-24 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 5 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 570 gr (1.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $0 | $0 |