Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ30W
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB600
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung HZ30W, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the HZ30W (12MP) is very close and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-S200 was brought out 7 months after the HZ30W and they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung HZ30W being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-S200 grades vs the HZ30W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung HZ30W. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung HZ30W
EX-S200 | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2010 | January 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Casio EX-S200
HZ30W | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung HZ30W
EX-S200 | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 has got outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung HZ30W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung HZ30W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 versus the HZ30W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and HZ30W is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing technical specs. The picture below may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and HZ30W.
As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-S200 to render greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger EX-S200 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung HZ30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung HZ30W |
Also called as | - | WB600 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2010-01-19 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $280 |