Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL620

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung SL620 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
13
Overall
25

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Released August 2010
Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL65
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL620 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-S200 was released 18 months later than the SL620 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-S200 scores vs the SL620 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung SL620

 EX-S200 SL620 
ReleasedAugust 2010February 2009More recent by 18 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-S200

 SL620 EX-S200 

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung SL620

 EX-S200 SL620 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal display sizing
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 provides physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the SL620.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL620 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and SL620 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and SL620.

Clearly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-S200 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-S200 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography features
Samsung SL620 Portrait photography features
35
focusing manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
26
comes with face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual mode
no external flash support
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography information
Samsung SL620 Street photography information
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
47
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than competition in class (168 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-S200
Sports photography with Samsung SL620
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
17
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography details
Samsung SL620 Travel photography details
65
MP count good (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (27mm)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
50
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (168g)
low MP (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung SL620 as a Landscape photography camera
42
focusing manually
relatively wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse mode
23
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging features
Samsung SL620 Vlogging features
29
relatively wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone socket
24
comes with face detection focusing
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external mic port
heavier than competition in class (168 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung SL620
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung SL620
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung SL620
Other name - PL65
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2010-08-03 2009-02-17
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 50 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 4.60 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132 gr (0.29 lbs) 168 gr (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-120 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $0 $200