Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL820
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32


94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as IT100

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung SL820, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-S200 was announced 18 months after the SL820 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL820 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-S200 scores vs the SL820 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung SL820. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung SL820
EX-S200 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Casio EX-S200
SL820 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung SL820
EX-S200 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has dimensions of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung SL820 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 versus the SL820.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and SL820 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and SL820.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to provide you with greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent EX-S200 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung SL820 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung SL820 |
Also called | - | IT100 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.4-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $0 | $280 |