Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-S200 was unveiled 5 months earlier than the ST65 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-S200 scores vs the ST65 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung ST65

 EX-S200 ST65 
Focus manually Very accurate focus

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-S200

 ST65 EX-S200 
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung ST65

 EX-S200 ST65 
ReleasedAugust 2010January 2011Similar age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 has physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-S200 and the ST65.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and ST65 is 96 and 99 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking technical specs. The image below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and ST65.

As you have seen, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of pictures although you should take the age of the products into consideration.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography info
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography info
35
manual focus
MP count decent (14MP)
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
28
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography information
Samsung ST65 Street photography information
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
49
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
max ISO too low (0)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography features
Samsung ST65 Sports photography features
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
26
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography highlights
Samsung ST65 Travel photography highlights
65
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (27mm)
missing Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
71
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography advice
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography advice
42
manual focus
pretty wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
37
good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inches)
resolution is good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging information
Samsung ST65 Vlogging information
29
pretty wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic support
27
good maximum aperture (f)
does not feature selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung ST65
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung ST65
General Information
Make Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung ST65
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2010-08-03 2011-01-19
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 50 -
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) ()
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132g (0.29 lb) -
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $0 $130