Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL320
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S200 was launched 18 months after the TL320 making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-S200 grades against the TL320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung TL320
EX-S200 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2010 | February 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-S200
TL320 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung TL320
EX-S200 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has got physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has proportions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung TL320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the TL320.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and TL320 is 96 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The image below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and TL320.
Clearly, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-S200 to give you extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-S200 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung TL320 |
Also Known as | - | WB1000 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-08-03 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $0 | $380 |