Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FS12
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FS12, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and FS12 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FS12 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 II was unveiled 6 years later than the FS12 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M10 II scores versus the FS12 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FS12
E-M10 II | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | April 2009 | More recent by 78 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FS12 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FS12
E-M10 II | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II features physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic FS12 has proportions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FS12 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 II against the FS12.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and FS12 is 82 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The photograph here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and FS12.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 129g (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $499 | $228 |