Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL350
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally Known as WB2000
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung TL350, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and TL350 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was unveiled 6 months later than the TL350 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-S200 grades against the TL350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung TL350. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung TL350
EX-S200 | TL350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Casio EX-S200
TL350 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung TL350
EX-S200 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2010 | February 2010 | Same generation | |
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 provides physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung TL350 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 and the TL350.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and TL350 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and TL350.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-S200 to provide extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung TL350 |
Also called as | - | WB2000 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 195g (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-120 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $400 |