Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB800F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively close and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WB800F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-S200 scores vs the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-S200 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-S200
| WB800F | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 29 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-S200 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 provides external measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 and the WB800F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through specifications. The pic here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and WB800F.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung WB800F to result in more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $300 |