Casio EX-S200 vs Sony T900
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Sony T900 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-S200 vs Sony T900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-S200 was revealed 18 months after the T900 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-S200 scores against the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony T900
| EX-S200 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Casio EX-S200
| T900 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony T900
| EX-S200 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 features outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 vs Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the T900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and T900 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The image here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and T900.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-S200 to offer you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-S200 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $300 |
