Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650

Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
32
Overall
36

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Launched August 2010
Sony W650
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
  • 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Casio EX-S200 versus Sony W650, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the W650 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-S200 was introduced 17 months prior to the W650 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony W650 being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the W650 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony W650

 EX-S200 W650 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Casio EX-S200

 W650 EX-S200 
RevealedJanuary 2012August 2010More recent by 17 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony W650

 EX-S200 W650 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 offers outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sony W650 has dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-S200 versus Sony W650 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 against the W650.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and W650 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through technical specs. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and W650.

As you can tell, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Sony W650 to show more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography details
Sony W650 Portrait photography details
34
focusing manually
MP count decent (14MP)
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
34
decent megapixels (16MP)
supports face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography features
Sony W650 Street photography features
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
63
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (124g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography highlights
Sony W650 Sports photography highlights
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W650 as a Travel photography camera
65
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (27mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
69
lighter than others in class (124g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-S200
Landscape photography with Sony W650
42
focusing manually
rather wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
43
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S200
Vlogging with Sony W650
29
rather wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic jack
33
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
lighter than others in class (124 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic socket
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Sony W650
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650
General Information
Company Casio Sony
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-08-03 2012-01-10
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 BIONZ
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.6-6.3
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - Clear Photo TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 2s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 3.70 m
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132 gr (0.29 lb) 124 gr (0.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-120 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $0 $140