Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Casio EX-S200 versus Sony W650, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the W650 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was introduced 17 months prior to the W650 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony W650 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the W650 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Sony W650 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony W650
| EX-S200 | W650 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Casio EX-S200
| W650 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony W650
| EX-S200 | W650 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 offers outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sony W650 has dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S200 versus Sony W650 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 against the W650.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and W650 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through technical specs. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and W650.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Sony W650 to show more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W650 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 124 gr (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $140 |