Casio EX-S200 vs Sony WX150
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony WX150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 133g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Sony WX150 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-S200 vs Sony WX150, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and WX150 (18MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-S200 was brought out 19 months prior to the WX150 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony WX150 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-S200 grades versus the WX150 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Sony WX150 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Sony WX150 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony WX150
| EX-S200 | WX150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony WX150 over the Casio EX-S200
| WX150 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony WX150
| EX-S200 | WX150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony WX150 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 offers external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Sony WX150 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 vs Sony WX150 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 vs the WX150.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and WX150 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony WX150 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The image here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and WX150.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Sony WX150 to show extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony WX150 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony WX150 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 133g (0.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $300 |