Clicky

Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M320

Portability
97
Imaging
32
Features
12
Overall
24
Casio Exilim EX-S5 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Casio EX-S5
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M320 Overview

The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-S5 and Kodak M320, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-S5 (9MP) and the M320 (9MP) is fairly close but the EX-S5 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") offer different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-S5 was unveiled within a month of the M320 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-S5 matches up vs the M320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Kodak M320

 EX-S5 M320 
Manual focus Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-S5

 M320 EX-S5 
Display resolution230k115kCrisper display (+115k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Kodak M320

 EX-S5 M320 
LaunchedJanuary 2009January 2009Same age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-S5 features external dimensions of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has specifications of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-S5 and Kodak M320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-S5 against the M320.

Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S5 and M320 is 97 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S5 and M320.

As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The EX-S5 provides the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field easier.

Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S5 Portrait photography factors
Kodak M320 Portrait photography factors
25
manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
19
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
MP count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-S5
Street photography with Kodak M320
48
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (155g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-S5
Sports photography with Kodak M320
16
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S5 Travel photography details
Kodak M320 Travel photography details
53
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
50
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S5 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
27
manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
22
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S5
Vlogging with Kodak M320
22
slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone port
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (155g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S5 and Kodak M320
 Casio Exilim EX-S5Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Brand Name Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-S5 Kodak EasyShare M320
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2009-01-08
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 9MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3472 x 2604
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range () 34-102mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focus range - 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 115 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/2 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1400 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 3.00 m
Flash settings - Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 100 gr (0.22 lbs) 155 gr (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $130 $39