Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB800F
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S5 was brought out 5 years earlier than the WB800F and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-S5 grades vs the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S5 and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S5 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Samsung WB800F
EX-S5 | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-S5
WB800F | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB800F
EX-S5 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S5 enjoys outside measurements of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-S5 and the WB800F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S5 and WB800F is 97 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The photograph here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S5 and WB800F.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB800F to give you extra detail having its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-S5 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB800F |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $130 | $300 |