Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-3
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 121g - 97 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Renewed by Olympus E-5
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-3 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-S7 versus Olympus E-3, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-S7 (12MP) and the E-3 (10MP) is pretty close but the EX-S7 (1/2.3") and E-3 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S7 was brought out 2 years later than the E-3 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S7 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-S7 matches up against the E-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S7 and Olympus E-3. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S7 Gallery and Olympus E-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S7 over the Olympus E-3
| EX-S7 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 | February 2008 | More recent by 25 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Casio EX-S7
| E-3 | EX-S7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-S7 and Olympus E-3
| EX-S7 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S7 enjoys external dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-3 has dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S7 versus Olympus E-3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S7 compared to the E-3.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S7 and E-3 is 96 and 56 respectively.
Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S7 and E-3.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-S7 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Casio EX-S7 will result in more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern EX-S7 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S7 | Olympus E-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S7 | Olympus E-3 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2008-02-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 45 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.58x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 13.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 890 grams (1.96 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 56 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 571 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $140 | $670 |