Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 121g - 97 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-S7 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the EX-S7 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S7 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S7 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-S7 scores versus the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S7 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S7 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S7 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-S7 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-S7
| WG-4 GPS | EX-S7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 48 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S7 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-S7 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-S7 offers physical measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S7 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S7 and the WG-4 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S7 and WG-4 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S7 and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older EX-S7 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S7 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S7 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $140 | $210 |