Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-S7 front Casio Exilim EX-S7 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-S7/Casio-EX-S7-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-70/Ricoh-WG-70-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 121g - 97 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-80
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-S7 (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The EX-S7 was manufactured 11 years before the WG-70 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S7 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-S7 scores against the WG-70 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S7 and Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S7 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S7 over the Ricoh WG-70
EX-S7 | WG-70 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-S7
WG-70 | EX-S7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 121 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S7 and Ricoh WG-70
EX-S7 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-S7 provides exterior dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S7 and the WG-70.
![Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S7-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S7 and WG-70 is 96 and 91 respectively.
![Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S7-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S7 and WG-70.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to deliver extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The older EX-S7 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
![Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S7-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S7-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S7 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S7 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S7 | Ricoh WG-70 |
Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2020-02-04 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | On, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $140 | $280 |