Clicky

Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S8200

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
19
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front
Portability
61
Imaging
39
Features
42
Overall
40

Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S8200 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z16
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 848 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
  • Launched September 2010
Fujifilm S8200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Revealed January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S8200 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S8200, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-Z16 was introduced 3 years earlier than the Fujifilm S8200 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z16 matches up against the Fujifilm S8200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Fujifilm S8200

 EX-Z16 Fujifilm S8200 

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Casio EX-Z16

 Fujifilm S8200 EX-Z16 
RevealedJanuary 2013September 2010Fresher by 28 months
Screen dimensions3""Bigger screen (+3")
Screen resolution460k0kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S8200

 EX-Z16 Fujifilm S8200 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S8200 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z16 provides external dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S8200 has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S8200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z16 and the Fujifilm S8200.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S8200 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S8200 is 99 and 61 respectively.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S8200 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S8200 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The graphic here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S8200.

Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Fujifilm S8200 to give greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-Z16 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S8200 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S8200 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S8200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm S8200 as a Portrait photography camera
27
focusing manually
no manual control
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
39
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 as a Street photography camera
Fujifilm S8200 as a Street photography camera
58
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (670g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 as a Sports photography camera
Fujifilm S8200 as a Sports photography camera
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
49
excellent zoom range (24-960mm 40.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Travel photography factors
Fujifilm S8200 Travel photography factors
53
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
52
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (960mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors in class (670 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z16
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S8200
32
focusing manually
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (")
no manual control
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
46
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Vlogging factors
Fujifilm S8200 Vlogging factors
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (848 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic support
24
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone socket
more heavy than competitors in class (670 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S8200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S8200
 Casio Exilim EX-Z16Fujifilm FinePix S8200
General Information
Brand Casio FujiFilm
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z16 Fujifilm FinePix S8200
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-09-20 2013-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 64 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 24-960mm (40.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus range 7cm 0cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size - 3"
Resolution of screen 0k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT color LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200k dots
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1700 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps)
Highest video resolution 848x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 670g (1.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - 4 x AA
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $100 $450