Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-870
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z16 versus Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z16 was released 6 years before the TG-870 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z16 grades versus the TG-870 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Olympus TG-870
| EX-Z16 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Casio EX-Z16
| TG-870 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2016 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 64 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+921k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Olympus TG-870
| EX-Z16 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 has got outside measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z16 versus Olympus TG-870 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z16 versus the TG-870.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and TG-870 is 99 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The pic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and TG-870.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-870 to show extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2016-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | - | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 0 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $100 | $280 |