Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III

Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is very comparable but the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") possess different sensor measurements.

The EX-Z16 was introduced 12 months prior to the GR Digital IV and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-Z16 grades against the GR Digital IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-Z16 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-Z16
GR Digital IV | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | ![]() | September 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | " | Larger display (+3") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 0k | Crisper display (+1230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-Z16 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 offers outside measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z16 vs the GR Digital IV.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z16 and GR Digital IV is 99 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The image here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and GR Digital IV.
Clearly, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z16 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Casio EX-Z16 will show greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | - | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 0 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 190g (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB65 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $100 | $599 |