Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z16 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very similar but the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z16 was announced 11 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z16 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-Z16 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | November 2009 | Fresher by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-Z16
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 0k | Clearer display (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-Z16 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z16 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z16 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z16 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z16 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 99 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z16 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have the same megapixels but different sensor sizing. The EX-Z16 provides the tinier sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field harder. The more recent EX-Z16 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | - | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 0k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 453g (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $100 | $566 |