Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-Z16 versus Ricoh WG-30, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z16 was introduced 5 years prior to the WG-30 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-Z16 grades versus the WG-30 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Ricoh WG-30. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh WG-30
EX-Z16 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-Z16
WG-30 | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2014 | September 2010 | More modern by 49 months | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | " | Larger display (+2.7") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-30
EX-Z16 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z16 enjoys outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z16 versus Ricoh WG-30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z16 against the WG-30.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and WG-30 is 99 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The pic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and WG-30.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-30 to resolve extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | - | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 0k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 192 gr (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $100 | $428 |