Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL102
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-Z16 versus Samsung SL102, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z16 was revealed 21 months later than the SL102 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-Z16 scores versus the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-Z16 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 21 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-Z16
| SL102 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.5" |  | " | Bigger screen (+2.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung SL102
| EX-Z16 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 has physical measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z16 versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z16 and the SL102.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and SL102 is 99 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z16 and SL102.
All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-Z16 to offer extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-Z16 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | - | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 0k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 116g (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $100 | $130 |