Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL320
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z16 versus Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is very comparable and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z16 was introduced 20 months after the TL320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-Z16 grades vs the TL320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Samsung TL320. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung TL320
EX-Z16 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | February 2009 | Newer by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-Z16
TL320 | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung TL320
EX-Z16 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z16 has got outer dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has proportions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z16 versus Samsung TL320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z16 against the TL320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and TL320 is 99 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The pic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and TL320.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures but you should factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more modern EX-Z16 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung TL320 |
Also called as | - | WB1000 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | - | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 0k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $100 | $380 |