Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A300
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2008
- Later Model is Sony A330
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A300 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A300, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Casio and Sony. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is very comparable but the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z16 was revealed 2 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z16 grades against the A300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Sony A300
EX-Z16 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2010 | January 2008 | Fresher by 33 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Casio EX-Z16
A300 | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | " | Larger display (+2.7") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Sony A300
EX-Z16 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z16 enjoys outer dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony A300 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z16 versus the A300.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and A300 is 99 and 64 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z16 and A300.
As you can tell, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z16 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-Z16 will produce extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-Z16 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2008-01-30 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | - | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 0k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | - |
Highest video resolution | 848x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 632 grams (1.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | Compact Flash |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $100 | $0 |