Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S3700
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
96 Imaging
46 Features
32 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S3700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
- 118g - 96 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2015
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S3700 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Nikon S3700, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and S3700 (20MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured 6 years before the S3700 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the S3700 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S3700 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Nikon Coolpix S3700. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Nikon S3700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Nikon S3700
| EX-Z2000 | S3700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S3700 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| S3700 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2015 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 61 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Nikon S3700
| EX-Z2000 | S3700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S3700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Nikon S3700 has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 118 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Nikon S3700 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the S3700.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and S3700 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S3700 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over specifications. The pic here will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and S3700.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Nikon S3700 to offer greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S3700 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S3700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Nikon Coolpix S3700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Nikon Coolpix S3700 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2015-01-14 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.7-6.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 118 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 58 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $175 |
