Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-520

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Olympus E-520 front
Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Introduced August 2008
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-510
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-520 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus E-520, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and E-520 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-Z2000 was brought out 17 months later than the E-520 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-Z2000 scores vs the E-520 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus E-520

 EX-Z2000 E-520 
IntroducedJanuary 2010August 2008Fresher by 17 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Casio EX-Z2000

 E-520 EX-Z2000 

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-520

 EX-Z2000 E-520 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus E-520 has sizing of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus E-520 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the E-520.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-520 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and E-520 is 95 and 68 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-520 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The photograph here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and E-520.

All in all, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z2000 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Casio EX-Z2000 will provide greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher EX-Z2000 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-520 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Portrait photography with Olympus E-520
35
manual focus
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
59
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
supports RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Street photography with Olympus E-520
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (152g)
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-520 Sports photography highlights
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great battery pack (650 CIPA)
has phase detect auto focus
max fps very slow (4.0 fps)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography info
Olympus E-520 Travel photography info
62
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (152 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
52
great battery pack (650 per charge)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
MP count low (10MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Landscape photography with Olympus E-520
47
manual focus
quite wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
58
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
great battery pack (650 CIPA)
small screen (2.7")
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-520 as a Vlogging camera
28
quite wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (152g)
9
no video shooting
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-520
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Olympus E-520
General Information
Brand Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Olympus E-520
Class Ultracompact Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2010-01-06 2008-08-20
Physical type Ultracompact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Highest aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Available lenses - 45
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 461 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.46x
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lbs) 552 grams (1.22 lbs)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 55
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 548
Other
Battery life - 650 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-110 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $0 $400