Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VR-320
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32


94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus VR-320, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-Z2000 was brought out 18 months earlier than the VR-320 making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus VR-320
EX-Z2000 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-Z2000
VR-320 | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 18 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus VR-320
EX-Z2000 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 features outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the VR-320.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and VR-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The graphic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and VR-320.
All in all, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures however you should really factor the release date of the products into consideration. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-110 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $179 |