Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX3
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh CX3, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z2000 was released 5 months before the CX3 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the CX3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Ricoh CX3. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh CX3
| EX-Z2000 | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| CX3 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh CX3
| EX-Z2000 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | June 2010 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 enjoys exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh CX3 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the CX3.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and CX3 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The photograph here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and CX3.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-Z2000 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $329 |