Olympus 550WP vs Olympus Tough-3000
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Also referred to as mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 550WP vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus 550WP versus Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the 550WP (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 550WP was brought out 12 months earlier than the Tough-3000 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the 550WP scores vs the Tough-3000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 550WP vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 550WP and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 550WP Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Olympus Tough-3000
| 550WP | Tough-3000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus 550WP
| Tough-3000 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 12 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Olympus Tough-3000
| 550WP | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 550WP comes with outside dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 550WP versus Olympus Tough-3000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the 550WP vs the Tough-3000.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 550WP and Tough-3000 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 550WP and Tough-3000.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus Tough-3000 to provide extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older 550WP will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Other name | mju 550WP | mju Tough 3000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $399 | $0 |