Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Renewed by Ricoh GR II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh GR, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the GR (16MP) is pretty close but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z2000 was released 4 years before the GR and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-Z2000 grades vs the GR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Ricoh GR. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh GR
| EX-Z2000 | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-Z2000
| GR | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 39 months |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GR
| EX-Z2000 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has specifications of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh GR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the GR.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and GR is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and GR.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z2000 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GR will render extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GR |
| Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2013-04-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $971 |