Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced August 2011
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured 19 months before the GXR Mount A12 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the GXR Mount A12 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-Z2000 | GXR Mount A12 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Casio EX-Z2000
GXR Mount A12 | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | January 2010 | More modern by 19 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-Z2000 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 enjoys outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has dimensions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the GXR Mount A12.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and GXR Mount A12 is 95 and 84 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The picture below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and GXR Mount A12.
To sum up, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z2000 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Casio EX-Z2000 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-01-06 | 2011-08-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 461k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/9000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 9.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 370 gr (0.82 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $0 | $349 |