Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL102
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung SL102, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z2000 was brought out 13 months later than the SL102 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-Z2000 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| SL102 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung SL102
| EX-Z2000 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 features external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the SL102.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and SL102 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and SL102.
As you can see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-Z2000 to produce more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z2000 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung SL102 |
| Other name | - | ES55 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $130 |