Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung SL202, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was announced 11 months later than the SL202 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the SL202 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-Z2000 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 11 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| SL202 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung SL202
| EX-Z2000 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the SL202.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The graphic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and SL202.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-Z2000 to give extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z2000 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | $140 |