Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Alternate Name is PL50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung SL202, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-Z2000 was announced 11 months later than the SL202 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the SL202 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung SL202

 EX-Z2000 SL202 
LaunchedJanuary 2010February 2009Fresher by 11 months
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution461k230kSharper display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-Z2000

 SL202 EX-Z2000 

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung SL202

 EX-Z2000 SL202 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the SL202.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The graphic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and SL202.

To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-Z2000 to give extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z2000 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography factors
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography factors
34
focusing manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual mode
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
25
supports face detection focus
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography factors
Samsung SL202 Street photography factors
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competition (152 grams)
47
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Sports photography with Samsung SL202
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Travel photography highlights
62
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (152g)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
57
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Landscape photography with Samsung SL202
46
focusing manually
relatively wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging features
Samsung SL202 Vlogging features
28
relatively wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of mic support
heavier than competition (152g)
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
supports face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung SL202
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Samsung SL202
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Samsung SL202
Also called as - PL50
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-01-06 2009-02-17
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1500 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.60 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 gr (0.34 pounds) 168 gr (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-110 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $0 $140