Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung TL500
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Announced July 2010
- Also referred to as EX1
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung TL500, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was announced 6 months earlier than the TL500 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the TL500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Samsung TL500. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung TL500
| EX-Z2000 | TL500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| TL500 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+153k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung TL500
| EX-Z2000 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | July 2010 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 features physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung TL500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the TL500.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and TL500 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out specs. The pic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and TL500.
All in all, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Casio EX-Z2000 will provide extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung TL500 |
| Also called | - | EX1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2010-07-09 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 386g (0.85 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $527 |
