Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Later Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is fairly similar but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z2000 was brought out 3 years before the DP1 Merrill and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the DP1 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
EX-Z2000 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Casio EX-Z2000
DP1 Merrill | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | January 2010 | Fresher by 25 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
EX-Z2000 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the DP1 Merrill.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and DP1 Merrill is 95 and 82 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and DP1 Merrill.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z2000 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will offer you extra detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | - |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $0 | $1,250 |