Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Sigma DP1 Merrill front
Portability
82
Imaging
56
Features
30
Overall
45

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Sigma DP1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
  • Revealed February 2012
  • Later Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview

Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is fairly similar but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-Z2000 was brought out 3 years before the DP1 Merrill and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the DP1 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill

 EX-Z2000 DP1 Merrill 
Display dimension3""Larger display (+3")

Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Casio EX-Z2000

 DP1 Merrill EX-Z2000 
RevealedFebruary 2012January 2010Fresher by 25 months
Display resolution920k461kClearer display (+459k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP1 Merrill

 EX-Z2000 DP1 Merrill 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the DP1 Merrill.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and DP1 Merrill is 95 and 82 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and DP1 Merrill.

To sum up, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z2000 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will offer you extra detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography information
Sigma DP1 Merrill Portrait photography information
34
has manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
73
has manual focus
decent MP (15MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography features
Sigma DP1 Merrill Street photography features
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competitors (152 grams)
64
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography info
Sigma DP1 Merrill Sports photography info
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
48
decent MP (15MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography highlights
Sigma DP1 Merrill Travel photography highlights
62
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (152 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
54
decent MP (15 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Landscape photography features
Sigma DP1 Merrill Landscape photography features
46
has manual focus
relatively wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
50
has manual focus
decent MP (15 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (")
lack of image stabilization
does not have Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging details
Sigma DP1 Merrill Vlogging details
28
relatively wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic support
heavier than competitors (152 grams)
22
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone port
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Sigma DP1 Merrill
General Information
Company Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Sigma DP1 Merrill
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-01-06 2012-02-08
Body design Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 15 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 4704 x 3136
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) ()
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/2.8
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches -
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs -
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152 gr (0.34 pounds) 330 gr (0.73 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-110 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $0 $1,250